Can You Sue If You Weren’t Wearing a Helmet in a Crash?
Written by Matthew Weidinger
In Denver, traffic laws require motorcyclists to wear helmets, but failing to do so does not automatically bar someone from suing after a crash. A person who wasn’t wearing a helmet can still file a personal injury claim if another party’s negligence caused the accident. The lack of a helmet might affect the compensation amount, but it does not eliminate the legal rights to pursue damages.
Personal injury laws focus on fault and causation, not solely on helmet use. Courts examine factors like who was responsible for the crash and the extent of injuries sustained. Understanding the intersection between helmet laws and injury claims is crucial for anyone involved in a motorcycle accident in Denver.
Understanding Helmet Laws and Crash Liability
Helmet laws vary by state and impact the ability to pursue a legal claim after a crash. A motorcyclist’s decision not to wear a helmet may influence liability, damages, and the outcome of a lawsuit.
Overview of Helmet Laws
Helmet requirements differ across the United States. Some states mandate helmets for all riders, while others only require them for certain age groups or allow riders to opt out entirely.
In states with universal helmet laws, not wearing a helmet can weaken a claim by showing negligence. This may reduce compensation for injuries under comparative fault or contributory negligence rules.
States without mandatory helmet laws generally do not penalize a rider for not wearing one, but injury severity might affect settlement amounts. Insurance companies might also reduce benefits if helmet use is a policy condition.
Legal Rights of Motorcyclists
Motorcyclists have the right to seek damages if another party is at fault, regardless of helmet use. Liability depends on who caused the crash, not just the safety gear worn.
However, failing to wear a helmet can affect the amount recovered. Courts may assign partial fault to the rider, limiting injury compensation. This does not eliminate the right to sue but influences damage awards.
Legal representation typically examines helmet laws, fault percentages, and injury details to build a case. Motorcyclists should understand their rights and responsibilities under relevant state laws to protect their position in a lawsuit.
Contributory Negligence and Impact on Compensation
Contributory negligence refers to the injured party’s role in causing or worsening their injuries. Whether the plaintiff wore a helmet can affect how much fault is assigned and how compensation is calculated.
What Is Contributory Negligence?
Contributory negligence occurs when the injured person is partly responsible for the accident or their resulting injuries. This legal concept limits or reduces the damages they can recover. If a cyclist were not wearing a helmet, some courts may assign them partial fault for their injuries. The level of fault depends on the jurisdiction’s laws and the details of the crash.
Many states use comparative negligence standards, meaning compensation is reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to the injured person. For example, if the injured cyclist is 20% at fault for not wearing a helmet, their compensation decreases by that amount.
Determining Fault Without a Helmet
Not wearing a helmet does not automatically mean the cyclist is fully at fault. The court examines all circumstances, including driver negligence and road conditions.
Courts often weigh helmet use as one factor in determining the extent of injury and fault. Failure to wear a helmet may be seen as a failure to mitigate damages, reducing the payout accordingly.
In some states with strict contributory negligence rules, this factor might bar any claim if the plaintiff is found even slightly responsible. In others, it results in proportional deductions. Key factors impacting fault determination include:
- Whether the driver caused the crash
- The severity of injuries linked to helmet absence
- Local laws on helmet requirements and negligence
This analysis directly influences the final compensation amount the plaintiff receives.
Filing a Lawsuit After a Helmetless Crash
Filing a lawsuit after a crash without a helmet involves specific legal steps and often requires expert guidance. Understanding the process, the role of legal counsel, and how experienced firms assist injured parties is essential.
Steps in the Legal Process
The first step is gathering evidence, including police reports, medical records, and witness statements. The injured party must file a formal complaint against the liable person or entity, initiating the lawsuit.
Next, the discovery phase allows both sides to exchange information and submit depositions. Settlement negotiations may occur, but if no agreement is reached, the case proceeds to trial.
Courts consider whether not wearing a helmet affects fault or damages, depending on state laws. This can impact compensation, but does not always prevent a lawsuit from moving forward.
Working With a Personal Injury Attorney
An attorney evaluates the claim’s strengths, identifies responsible parties, and advises on potential outcomes. They handle negotiations with insurers, gathering detailed evidence to support the case. Legal representation ensures procedural rules are met, avoiding delays or dismissal. Attorneys also explain how helmet laws in the jurisdiction might influence liability and damages.
Experienced lawyers advocate for fair compensation, including medical costs, lost income, and pain and suffering. Their involvement often increases the chances of a favorable resolution.
How Smith & Weidinger PLLC Can Help
Smith & Weidinger PLLC specializes in personal injury cases involving motorcycle crashes without helmets. We offer thorough case evaluations to uncover all liable parties. Our firm manages all legal filings and handles communication with insurance companies and opposing counsel. We focus on maximizing compensation despite helmet use issues.
Our team provides personalized support, explaining complex legal matters in plain terms. Smith & Weidinger PLLC uses a strategic approach to protect our clients’ rights throughout the legal process.
Note: The information provided in this blog post has been compiled from publicly available and secondary sources. While we strive for accuracy, some details may become outdated or contain inadvertent errors. If you believe any information is incorrect or requires updating, please contact Smith & Weidinger so that we may review and make the appropriate corrections.
Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a solicitation for business. The photo used is not from the scene of the incident described. Viewing this content does not create an attorney-client relationship with Smith & Weidinger. If you have been injured in an accident, please seek immediate medical attention and then consult with a qualified attorney to discuss your legal rights and options.
Related Posts
Injured at a Hotel, Restaurant, or Airbnb? Know...
If you get injured while staying at a hotel, dining at a restaurant, or using...
Can You Sue a Driver for Hitting You...
If you are hit by a driver while riding your bike in a crosswalk, you...
Understanding Colorado’s Headlight Laws
Driving safely in Colorado isn’t just about obeying speed limits or yielding at intersections—it’s also...